|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | REGION |SUB|PRI| LAT | LONG | XRES| YRES| XSIZ| YSIZ| AREA |COMMENTS |ISSUES | |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | c9_5539r| 0 | h | -7.428| 5.371 | 175 | 159 | 570 | 795 | 12608.9|Medium res, many good craters,|JPL tool piled up 90 craters at 6 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |"crater01" region. (PROCESSED |diameter. All 429 original JPL craters w| | | | | | | | | | | |IN 2009 REPORT, AND 2010) |ere classified correctly as 0's, but the| | | | | | | | | | | | |n the 398 surviving (real) craters were | | | | | | | | | | | | |later reclassified to 3's in tobill*v2.r| | | | | | | | | | | | |eg (probable tool problem). tobill*v3.re| | | | | | | | | | | | |g fixed this problem, but it is unclear | | | | | | | | | | | | |which version (class 0's or 3's) was use| | | | | | | | | | | | |d as the base for that file. In v3, 282 | | | | | | | | | | | | |class 3 craters remain (out of 392 survi| | | | | | | | | | | | |ving JPL craters, or 72%) which seems ex| | | | | | | | | | | | |tremely high, but the image does appear | | | | | | | | | | | | |visually to have more class 3's than 4's| | | | | | | | | | | | |so the stats may be reasonable after all| | | | | | | | | | | | |. 58 of the 282 final type 3 JPL crater| | | | | | | | | | | | |s had a minimum size of 6 pixels. JPL cr| | | | | | | | | | | | |aters were quantized into 39 unique bins| | | | | | | | | | | | |with slightly worse resolution than hand| | | | | | | | | | | | |-marked craters: 6 bins from 6-7pixels (| | | | | | | | | | | | |1.05km-1.225km), 6 bins from 7-8pixels (| | | | | | | | | | | | |1.225km-1.4km), etc., so some quantizati| | | | | | | | | | | | |on effects might be more visible for cra| | | | | | | | | | | | |ters below 10 pixels? | |c10_2878r| 0 | h | 20.514|142.251| 94 | 99 | 795 | 615 | 4549.94|Medium/high res of Asgard regi|JPL tool piled up 162 craters at 6 pixel| | | | | | | | | | | |on. (PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT,|diameter. All 493 original JPL craters w| | | | | | | | | | | |AND 2010) |ere classified correctly as 0's, but the| | | | | | | | | | | | |n the 463 surviving (real) craters were | | | | | | | | | | | | |later reclassified to 3's in tobill*v1.r| | | | | | | | | | | | |eg (probable tool problem). tobill*v2.re| | | | | | | | | | | | |g fixed this problem, but it is unclear | | | | | | | | | | | | |which version (class 0's or 3's) was use| | | | | | | | | | | | |d as the base for that file. In v2, 288 | | | | | | | | | | | | |class 3 craters remain (out of 446 survi| | | | | | | | | | | | |ving JPL craters, or 65%) which seems ex| | | | | | | | | | | | |tremely high (and the image looks like i| | | | | | | | | | | | |t should have more class 4's than 3's vi| | | | | | | | | | | | |sually). 86 of the 288 final type 3 JPL| | | | | | | | | | | | |craters had a minimum size of 6 pixels (| | | | | | | | | | | | |54 class 4's). JPL craters were quantize| | | | | | | | | | | | |d into 59 unique bins with slightly bett| | | | | | | | | | | | |er resolution than hand-marked craters: | | | | | | | | | | | | |6 bins from 6-7pixels (.564km-.658km), 1| | | | | | | | | | | | |1 bins from 7-8pixels (.658km-.752km), e| | | | | | | | | | | | |tc. | |c30_5378r| 0 | h | 14.266|139.892| 12.4| 10.7| 795 | 715 | 75.4186|High res, "HiRes_02" region. U| | | | | | | | | | | | |se sub-regions instead of whol| | | | | | | | | | | | |e image. | | |c30_5378r| 1 | h | 14.266|139.892| 12.4| 10.7| 795 | 287 | 30.2729|High res, "HiRes_02" region. (|Initially the whole region was marked by| | | | | | | | | | | |PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT, AND |the JPL tool, then split into sub-region| | | | | | | | | | | |2010) |s. JPL tool piled up 54 final craters at| | | | | | | | | | | | |6 pixel diameter. All 793 original JPL c| | | | | | | | | | | | |raters (in the whole region) were classi| | | | | | | | | | | | |fied correctly as 0's, but then 211 of 3| | | | | | | | | | | | |28 craters (64%) in this sub-region were| | | | | | | | | | | | |later reclassified to 3's. This seems hi| | | | | | | | | | | | |gh, but the image visually appears to ha| | | | | | | | | | | | |ve more class 3's than 4's so it might b| | | | | | | | | | | | |e OK. 31 of the 211 final type 3 JPL cr| | | | | | | | | | | | |aters had a minimum size of 6 pixels (22| | | | | | | | | | | | |class 4's). JPL craters were quantized i| | | | | | | | | | | | |nto 65 unique bins with slightly better | | | | | | | | | | | | |resolution than hand-marked craters: 7 b| | | | | | | | | | | | |ins from 6-7pixels (.0744km-.0868km), 9 | | | | | | | | | | | | |bins from 7-8pixels (.0868km-.0992km), e| | | | | | | | | | | | |tc. | |c30_5378r| 2 | h | 14.266|139.892| 12.4| 10.7| 795 | 262 | 27.6359|High res, "HiRes_02" region. (|Initially the whole region was marked by| | | | | | | | | | | |PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT, AND |the JPL tool, then split into sub-region| | | | | | | | | | | |2010) |s. JPL tool piled up 44 final craters at| | | | | | | | | | | | |6 pixel diameter. All 793 original JPL c| | | | | | | | | | | | |raters (in the whole region) were classi| | | | | | | | | | | | |fied correctly as 0's, but then 225 of 3| | | | | | | | | | | | |06 craters (74%) in this sub-region were| | | | | | | | | | | | |later reclassified to 3's. This seems hi| | | | | | | | | | | | |gh, but the image visually appears to ha| | | | | | | | | | | | |ve more class 3's than 4's so it might b| | | | | | | | | | | | |e OK. 36 of the 225 final type 3 JPL cr| | | | | | | | | | | | |aters had a minimum size of 6 pixels (8 | | | | | | | | | | | | |class 4's). JPL craters were quantized i| | | | | | | | | | | | |nto 73 unique bins with slightly better | | | | | | | | | | | | |resolution than hand-marked craters: 6 b| | | | | | | | | | | | |ins from 6-7pixels (.0744km-.0868km), 12| | | | | | | | | | | | |bins from 7-8pixels (.0868km-.0992km), e| | | | | | | | | | | | |tc. | |c30_5378r| 3 | h | 14.266|139.892| 12.4| 10.7| 795 | 125 | 13.1851|High res, "HiRes_02" region. (|Initially the whole region was marked by| | | | | | | | | | | |PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT, AND |the JPL tool, then split into sub-region| | | | | | | | | | | |2010) |s. JPL tool piled up 15 final craters at| | | | | | | | | | | | |6 pixel diameter. All 793 original JPL c| | | | | | | | | | | | |raters (in the whole region) were classi| | | | | | | | | | | | |fied correctly as 0's, but then 75 of 96| | | | | | | | | | | | |craters (78%) in this sub-region were la| | | | | | | | | | | | |ter reclassified to 3's. This seems high| | | | | | | | | | | | |, but the image visually appears to have| | | | | | | | | | | | |more class 3's than 4's so it might be O| | | | | | | | | | | | |K. 12 of the 75 final type 3 JPL crater| | | | | | | | | | | | |s had a minimum size of 6 pixels (3 clas| | | | | | | | | | | | |s 4's). JPL craters were quantized into | | | | | | | | | | | | |35 unique bins with OK resolution: 8 bin| | | | | | | | | | | | |s from 6-7pixels (.0744km-.0868km), 6 bi| | | | | | | | | | | | |ns from 7-8pixels (.0868km-.0992km), etc| | | | | | | | | | | | |. | |c30_5453r| 0 | h | 12.377|140.474| 16.7| 14.6| 794 | 369 | 71.4358|High res, "HiRes_03" region. (|JPL tool piled up only 7 craters at 6 pi| | | | | | | | | | | |PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT, AND |xel diameter, so smaller R-plot bin stat| | | | | | | | | | | |2010) |s might not be too bad. All 210 original| | | | | | | | | | | | |JPL craters were classified correctly as| | | | | | | | | | | | |0's, but then all 210 later reclassified| | | | | | | | | | | | |to 3's in tobill*v1.reg (probable tool p| | | | | | | | | | | | |roblem). tobill*v2.reg fixed this proble| | | | | | | | | | | | |m, but it is unclear which version (clas| | | | | | | | | | | | |s 0's or 3's) was used as the base for t| | | | | | | | | | | | |hat file. In v2, 129 class 3 craters rem| | | | | | | | | | | | |ain (out of 208 surviving JPL craters, o| | | | | | | | | | | | |r 62%) which seems high, but the image d| | | | | | | | | | | | |oes appear visually to have more class 3| | | | | | | | | | | | |'s than 4's (it looks very similar to c3| | | | | | | | | | | | |0_5378r with a similar distribution of 3| | | | | | | | | | | | |'s and 4's) so the stats may be reasonab| | | | | | | | | | | | |le after all. 4 of the 208 final type 3| | | | | | | | | | | | |JPL craters had a minimum size of 6 pixe| | | | | | | | | | | | |ls (3 class 4's). JPL craters were quant| | | | | | | | | | | | |ized into 46 unique bins with worse reso| | | | | | | | | | | | |lution than hand-marked craters: 4 bins | | | | | | | | | | | | |from 6-7pixels (.1km-.117km), 4 bins fro| | | | | | | | | | | | |m 7-8pixels (.117km-.134km), etc., so so| | | | | | | | | | | | |me quantization effects might be more vi| | | | | | | | | | | | |sible for craters below 8 pixels? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |c30_5253r| 0 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6*| 8.6*|1631*| 722*|87.2121*|High res, "HiRes_01" region. I| | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. Don't use e| | | | | | | | | | | | |ntire image. | | |c30_5253r| 1 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6*| 8.6*| 240 | 250 | 4.44* |High res, "HiRes_01" region. I|JPL tool piled up 22 craters at 5 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. PROCESSED F|diameter (of 143), so no problems at 6 p| | | | | | | | | | | |OR 2010 REPORT. Combine sub-re|ixels. 100 unique quantization bins used| | | | | | | | | | | |gion stats together. |(with 80 populated), so no problems ther| | | | | | | | | | | | |e either. | |c30_5253r| 2 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6*| 8.6*| 440 | 175 | 5.6949*|High res, "HiRes_01" region. I|JPL tool piled up 9 craters at 5 pixel d| | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. PROCESSED F|iameter (of 103), so no problems at 6 pi| | | | | | | | | | | |OR 2010 REPORT. Combine sub-re|xels. 100 unique quantization bins used | | | | | | | | | | | |gion stats together. |(with 54 populated), but only 2 bins bet| | | | | | | | | | | | |ween 6-7 pixels (.0516km-.0602km) and 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | |between 7-8 (.0602km-.0688km) so some mi| | | | | | | | | | | | |nor quantizing might be visible at these| | | | | | | | | | | | |crater sizes (but is real)?? | |c30_5253r| 3 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6*| 8.6*| 210 | 350 | 5.439* |High res, "HiRes_01" region. I| | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. | | |c30_5253r| 4 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6*| 8.6*| 390 | 255 | 7.3593*|High res, "HiRes_01" region. I| | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. | | |c30_5253r| 5 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6*| 8.6*| 175 | 200 | 2.59* |High res, "HiRes_01" region. I| | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | c9_0500r| 1 | m | 12.943| 25.843|520.3|415.3| 795 | 795 |136621.5|Low res of Valhala region, som| | | | | | | | 9 | 9 | | | 5 |e larger craters. NEED TO ISIS| | | | | | | | | | | | |-PROJECT?? | | |c10_2852r| 1 | m | 23.688|142.307|95.30|104.3| 795 | 695 | 5492.51|Medium-res, NEED TO ISIS-PROJE| | | | | | | | | 1 | | | |CT?? | | | c9_5552r| 1 | m |-10.106| 8.141 |181.4|162.4| 520 | 795 |12182.61|Medium-res, NEED TO ISIS-PROJE| | | | | | | | 5 | 1 | | | |CT?? | | |c10_2940r| 1 | m | 14.753|141.937|89.29|90.15| 715 | 725 | 4172.66|Medium-res | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|