|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | REGION |SUB|PRI| LAT | LONG | XRES | YRES | XSIZ | YSIZ | AREA |COMMENTS |ISSUES | |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | c9_5539r| 0 | h | -7.428| 5.371 | 175 | 159 | 570 | 795 | 12608.9 |Medium res, many good craters,|JPL tool piled up 90 craters at 6 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |"crater01" region. (PROCESSED |diameter. All 429 original JPL craters w| | | | | | | | | | | |IN 2009 REPORT, AND 2010) |ere classified correctly as 0's, but the| | | | | | | | | | | | |n the 398 surviving (real) craters were | | | | | | | | | | | | |later reclassified to 3's in tobill*v2.r| | | | | | | | | | | | |eg (probable tool problem). tobill*v3.re| | | | | | | | | | | | |g fixed this problem, but it is unclear | | | | | | | | | | | | |which version (class 0's or 3's) was use| | | | | | | | | | | | |d as the base for that file. In v3, 282 | | | | | | | | | | | | |class 3 craters remain (out of 392 survi| | | | | | | | | | | | |ving JPL craters, or 72%) which seems ex| | | | | | | | | | | | |tremely high, but the image does appear | | | | | | | | | | | | |visually to have more class 3's than 4's| | | | | | | | | | | | |so the stats may be reasonable after all| | | | | | | | | | | | |. 58 of the 282 final type 3 JPL crater| | | | | | | | | | | | |s had a minimum size of 6 pixels. JPL cr| | | | | | | | | | | | |aters were quantized into 28 unique bins| | | | | | | | | | | | |with poor resolution, 4 bins from 6-7pix| | | | | | | | | | | | |els (1.05km-1.225km), 4 bins from 7-8pix| | | | | | | | | | | | |els (1.225km-1.4km), etc., so some quant| | | | | | | | | | | | |ization effects might be more visible fo| | | | | | | | | | | | |r craters below 10 pixels? Also, the JPL| | | | | | | | | | | | |tool produces a strange double spike, th| | | | | | | | | | | | |e first at 6 pixels and the second at 6.| | | | | | | | | | | | |5 (with a lower bin between)... could th| | | | | | | | | | | | |is be a real feature in the image someho| | | | | | | | | | | | |w? | |c10_2878r| 0 | h | 20.514|142.251| 94 | 99 | 795 | 615 | 4549.94 |Medium/high res of Asgard regi|JPL tool piled up 162 craters at 6 pixel| | | | | | | | | | | |on. (PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT,|diameter. All 493 original JPL craters w| | | | | | | | | | | |AND 2010) |ere classified correctly as 0's, but the| | | | | | | | | | | | |n the 463 surviving (real) craters were | | | | | | | | | | | | |later reclassified to 3's in tobill*v1.r| | | | | | | | | | | | |eg (probable tool problem). tobill*v2.re| | | | | | | | | | | | |g fixed this problem, but it is unclear | | | | | | | | | | | | |which version (class 0's or 3's) was use| | | | | | | | | | | | |d as the base for that file. In v2, 288 | | | | | | | | | | | | |class 3 craters remain (out of 446 survi| | | | | | | | | | | | |ving JPL craters, or 65%) which seems ex| | | | | | | | | | | | |tremely high (and the image looks like i| | | | | | | | | | | | |t should have more class 4's than 3's vi| | | | | | | | | | | | |sually). 86 of the 288 final type 3 JPL| | | | | | | | | | | | |craters had a minimum size of 6 pixels (| | | | | | | | | | | | |54 class 4's). JPL craters were quantize| | | | | | | | | | | | |d into 18 unique bins with poor resoluti| | | | | | | | | | | | |on, 4 bins from 6-7pixels (.564km-.658km| | | | | | | | | | | | |), 3 bins from 7-8pixels (.658km-.752km)| | | | | | | | | | | | |, etc. | |c30_5378r| 0 | h | 14.266|139.892| 12.4 | 10.7 | 795 | 715 | 53.32 |High res, "HiRes_02" region. (|JPL tool piled up 114 final craters at 6| | | | | | | | | | | |PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT, AND |pixel diameter. All 739 original JPL cra| | | | | | | | | | | |2010) Area calculated by addin|ters (in the whole region) were classifi| | | | | | | | | | | |g sub-regions (71sqkm) and red|ed correctly as 0's, but then they were | | | | | | | | | | | |ucing by 25% to account for ar|all reclassified (tool issue?) to 3's in| | | | | | | | | | | |tifacts and mountains. |version 1 of the tobill*reg file. Reclas| | | | | | | | | | | | |sification happened in version 2, probab| | | | | | | | | | | | |ly starting with the biased version 1 fi| | | | | | | | | | | | |le. 516 of the 735 final JPL craters (70| | | | | | | | | | | | |%) are class 3's. This seems high, so th| | | | | | | | | | | | |e image may be biased toward class 3's o| | | | | | | | | | | | |ver class 4's. 80 of the 516 final type| | | | | | | | | | | | |3 JPL craters had a minimum size of 6 pi| | | | | | | | | | | | |xels (33 class 4's). JPL craters were qu| | | | | | | | | | | | |antized into 42 unique bins with poor re| | | | | | | | | | | | |solution, 4 bins from 6-7pixels (.0744km| | | | | | | | | | | | |-.0868km), 4 bins from 7-8pixels (.0868k| | | | | | | | | | | | |m-.0992km), etc. | |c30_5378r| 1 | h | 14.266|139.892| 12.4 | 10.7 | 795 | 287 | 30.2729 |SUB-REGION NOT USED? High res,|Initially the whole region was marked by| | | | | | | | | | | |"HiRes_02" region. (PROCESSED |the JPL tool, then split into sub-region| | | | | | | | | | | |IN 2009 REPORT, AND 2010) |s. Sub-regions were not used for the rep| | | | | | | | | | | | |ort. | |c30_5378r| 2 | h | 14.266|139.892| 12.4 | 10.7 | 795 | 262 | 27.6359 |SUB-REGION NOT USED? High res,|Initially the whole region was marked by| | | | | | | | | | | |"HiRes_02" region. (PROCESSED |the JPL tool, then split into sub-region| | | | | | | | | | | |IN 2009 REPORT, AND 2010) |s. Sub-regions were not used for the rep| | | | | | | | | | | | |ort. | |c30_5378r| 3 | h | 14.266|139.892| 12.4 | 10.7 | 795 | 125 | 13.1851 |SUB-REGION NOT USED? High res,|Initially the whole region was marked by| | | | | | | | | | | |"HiRes_02" region. (PROCESSED |the JPL tool, then split into sub-region| | | | | | | | | | | |IN 2009 REPORT, AND 2010) |s. Sub-regions were not used for the rep| | | | | | | | | | | | |ort. | |c30_5453r| 0 | h | 12.377|140.474| 16.7 | 14.6 | 794 | 369 | 50 |High res, "HiRes_03" region. (|JPL tool piled up only 7 craters at 6 pi| | | | | | | | | | | |PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT, AND |xel diameter, so smaller R-plot bin stat| | | | | | | | | | | |2010) Area calculated by reduc|s might not be too bad. All 210 original| | | | | | | | | | | |ing image area (71.4358) by 30|JPL craters were classified correctly as| | | | | | | | | | | |% to account for mountains. |0's, but then all 210 later reclassified| | | | | | | | | | | | |to 3's in tobill*v1.reg (probable tool p| | | | | | | | | | | | |roblem). tobill*v2.reg fixed this proble| | | | | | | | | | | | |m, but it is unclear which version (clas| | | | | | | | | | | | |s 0's or 3's) was used as the base for t| | | | | | | | | | | | |hat file. In v2, 129 class 3 craters rem| | | | | | | | | | | | |ain (out of 208 surviving JPL craters, o| | | | | | | | | | | | |r 62%) which seems high, but the image d| | | | | | | | | | | | |oes appear visually to have more class 3| | | | | | | | | | | | |'s than 4's (it looks very similar to c3| | | | | | | | | | | | |0_5378r with a similar distribution of 3| | | | | | | | | | | | |'s and 4's) so the stats may be reasonab| | | | | | | | | | | | |le after all. 4 of the 208 final type 3| | | | | | | | | | | | |JPL craters had a minimum size of 6 pixe| | | | | | | | | | | | |ls (3 class 4's). JPL craters were quant| | | | | | | | | | | | |ized into 36 unique bins with poor resol| | | | | | | | | | | | |ution, 4 bins from 6-7pixels (.1km-.117k| | | | | | | | | | | | |m), 3 bins from 7-8pixels (.117km-.134km| | | | | | | | | | | | |), etc., so some quantization effects mi| | | | | | | | | | | | |ght be more visible for craters below 8 | | | | | | | | | | | | |pixels? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |c30_5253r| 0 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6* | 8.6* | 1631*| 722* | 87.2121* |High res, "HiRes_01" region. I| | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. Don't use e| | | | | | | | | | | | |ntire image. | | |c30_5253r| 1 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6* | 8.6* | 240 | 250 | 4.44* |High res, "HiRes_01" region. I|JPL tool piled up 22 craters at 5 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. PROCESSED F|diameter (of 143), so no problems at 6 p| | | | | | | | | | | |OR 2010 REPORT. Combine sub-re|ixels (.0516km). 100 unique quantization| | | | | | | | | | | |gion stats together. |bins used (with 80 populated), so no pro| | | | | | | | | | | | |blems there either. | |c30_5253r| 2 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6* | 8.6* | 440 | 175 | 5.6949* |High res, "HiRes_01" region. I|JPL tool piled up 9 craters at 5 pixel d| | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. PROCESSED F|iameter (of 103), so no problems at 6 pi| | | | | | | | | | | |OR 2010 REPORT. Combine sub-re|xels (.0516km). 100 unique quantization | | | | | | | | | | | |gion stats together. |bins used (with 54 populated), but only | | | | | | | | | | | | |2 bins between 6-7 pixels (.0516km-.0602| | | | | | | | | | | | |km) and 5 between 7-8 (.0602km-.0688km) | | | | | | | | | | | | |so some minor quantizing might be visibl| | | | | | | | | | | | |e at these crater sizes (but is real)?? | |c30_5253r| 3 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6* | 8.6* | 210 | 350 | 5.439* |High res, "HiRes_01" region. I| | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. | | |c30_5253r| 4 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6* | 8.6* | 390 | 255 | 7.3593* |High res, "HiRes_01" region. I| | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. | | |c30_5253r| 5 | m | 12.303|120.758| 8.6* | 8.6* | 175 | 200 | 2.59* |High res, "HiRes_01" region. I| | | | | | | | | | | | |SIS MAP PROJECTED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | c9_0500r| 1 | m | 12.943| 25.843|520.39|415.39| 795 | 795 | 136621.55|Low res of Valhala region, som| | | | | | | | | | | | |e larger craters. NEED TO ISIS| | | | | | | | | | | | |-PROJECT?? | | |c10_2852r| 1 | m | 23.688|142.307| 95.30|104.31| 795 | 695 | 5492.51 |Medium-res, NEED TO ISIS-PROJE| | | | | | | | | | | | |CT?? | | | c9_5552r| 1 | m |-10.106| 8.141 |181.45|162.41| 520 | 795 | 12182.61 |Medium-res, NEED TO ISIS-PROJE| | | | | | | | | | | | |CT?? | | |c10_2940r| 1 | m | 14.753|141.937| 89.29| 90.15| 715 | 725 | 4172.66 |Medium-res | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|