|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | REGION |SUB|PRI| LAT | LONG | XRES | YRES | XSIZ | YSIZ | AREA |COMMENTS |ISSUES | |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |g28_3652r| 1 | h |-14.267|320.045| 22.0 | 21.9 | 335 | 225 | 36.3157 |High res image of the dark reg|JPL tool piled up 22 craters at 6 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |ion. (PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT|diameter. All 93 original JPL craters we| | | | | | | | | | | |, AND 2010) |re classified as 3's. All but 29 (69%) w| | | | | | | | | | | | |ere later changed to other classes (i.e.| | | | | | | | | | | | |a bias toward class 3 JPL craters probab| | | | | | | | | | | | |ly does not exist in this image). 26 of | | | | | | | | | | | | |the 29 final type 3 JPL craters had a mi| | | | | | | | | | | | |nimum size of 6 pixels. JPL craters were| | | | | | | | | | | | |quantized into 19 unique bins with terri| | | | | | | | | | | | |ble resolution, 3 bins from 6-7pixels (.| | | | | | | | | | | | |132km-.154km), 4 bins from 7-8pixels (.1| | | | | | | | | | | | |54km-.176km), etc. | |g28_3600r| 1 | h |-14.444|318.844| 20.6 | 19.8 | 415 | 330 | 55.8592 |High res image of the bright r|JPL tool piled up 97 craters at 6 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |egion. (PROCESSED IN 2009 REPO|diameter. All 299 original JPL craters w| | | | | | | | | | | |RT, AND 2010) |ere classified as 3's. All but 133 (56%)| | | | | | | | | | | | |were later changed to other classes. 30 | | | | | | | | | | | | |of the 133 final type 3 JPL craters had | | | | | | | | | | | | |a minimum size of 6 pixels. JPL craters | | | | | | | | | | | | |were quantized into 25 unique bins with | | | | | | | | | | | | |poor resolution, 4 bins from 6-7 pixels | | | | | | | | | | | | |(.124km-.144km), 4 bins from 7-8 pixels | | | | | | | | | | | | |(.144km-.165km), etc. | |g28_3539r| 1 | h |-15.900|310.677| 16.4 | 16.7 | 300 | 300 | 24.6492 |High res image of "Smooth01" r|JPL tool piled up 265 craters at 6 pix d| | | | | | | | | | | |egion (not so smooth after all|iameter (out of 342, ouch!!). All 338 or| | | | | | | | | | | |). (PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT, |iginal JPL craters were classified as 3'| | | | | | | | | | | |AND 2010) |s. All but 109 (68%) were later changed | | | | | | | | | | | | |to other classes (i.e. a bias toward cla| | | | | | | | | | | | |ss 3 JPL craters probably does not exist| | | | | | | | | | | | |in this image). 36 of the 109 final type| | | | | | | | | | | | |3 JPL craters had a minimum size of 6 pi| | | | | | | | | | | | |xels, so most were larger. JPL craters w| | | | | | | | | | | | |ere quantized into 18 unique bins with t| | | | | | | | | | | | |errible resolution, 2 bins from 6-7pixel| | | | | | | | | | | | |s (.098km-.114km), 2 bins from 7-8pixels| | | | | | | | | | | | |(.114km-.131km), etc, but due to the sma| | | | | | | | | | | | |ll number of JPL craters quantizing shou| | | | | | | | | | | | |ld not be very noticable. | | g8_7800r| 1 | h | 40.458|192.804| 968 | 1279 | 225 | 125 | 34820.8 |"light" section of regional co|JPL tool piled up 11 craters at 6 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |ntext image (PROCESSED IN 2009|diameter. All 24 original JPL craters we| | | | | | | | | | | |REPORT) |re classified as 3's. 11 or 22 surviving| | | | | | | | | | | | |craters (50%) were later changed to clas| | | | | | | | | | | | |s 4. With this few craters, the stats ar| | | | | | | | | | | | |e probably fine. 4 of the 11 final type | | | | | | | | | | | | |3 JPL craters had a minimum size of 6 pi| | | | | | | | | | | | |xels. JPL craters were quantized into on| | | | | | | | | | | | |ly 10 unique bins but with 6 bins from 6| | | | | | | | | | | | |-7 pixels in size, so quantization shoul| | | | | | | | | | | | |dn't be an issue. | | g8_7800r| 2 | h | 40.458|192.804| 968 | 1279 | 165 | 165 | 33706.5 |"dark" section of regional con|JPL tool piled up 2 craters at 6 pixel d| | | | | | | | | | | |text image (PROCESSED IN 2009 |iameter. All 11 original JPL craters wer| | | | | | | | | | | |REPORT) |e classified as 3's. All (100%) were lat| | | | | | | | | | | | |er changed to other classes. Way too few| | | | | | | | | | | | |craters to say anything meaningful. JPL | | | | | | | | | | | | |craters were quantized into only 6 uniqu| | | | | | | | | | | | |e bins. | | g8_2413r| 1 | h |-29.261|178.741| 195 | 231 | 420 | 295 | 5581.08 |Medium res image of the lighte|JPL tool piled up 47 craters at 6 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |r region (Caldra-like features|diameter. All 232 original JPL craters w| | | | | | | | | | | |), in a slightly smoother area|ere classified as 3's. All but 88 (57%) | | | | | | | | | | | |. (PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT) |were later changed to other classes (i.e| | | | | | | | | | | | |. a bias toward class 3 JPL craters prob| | | | | | | | | | | | |ably does not exist in this image). 24 o| | | | | | | | | | | | |f the 88 final type 3 JPL craters had a | | | | | | | | | | | | |minimum size of 6 pixels (23 class 4's).| | | | | | | | | | | | |JPL craters were quantized into 8 unique| | | | | | | | | | | | |bins with poor resolution, 4 bins from 6| | | | | | | | | | | | |-7pixels (1.17km-1.365km), 3 bins from 7| | | | | | | | | | | | |-8pixels (1.365km-1.56km), etc. | | g8_2413r| 2 | h |-29.261|178.741| 195 | 231 | 285 | 395 | 5070.94 |Medium res image of the lighte|JPL tool piled up 14 craters at 6 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |r region (Caldra-like features|diameter. All 106 original JPL craters w| | | | | | | | | | | |), in a grooved terrain area. |ere classified as 3's. 51 of 102 survivi| | | | | | | | | | | |(PROCESSED IN 2009 REPORT) |ng JPL craters (50%) were later changed | | | | | | | | | | | | |to other classes (i.e. a slight bias tow| | | | | | | | | | | | |ard class 2 and 3 JPL craters may exist | | | | | | | | | | | | |in this image since there are only 34 ty| | | | | | | | | | | | |pe 4's). Only 6 of the 51 final type 3 J| | | | | | | | | | | | |PL craters had a minimum size of 6 pixel| | | | | | | | | | | | |s, so quantization at 6 pixel diameters | | | | | | | | | | | | |exists but shouldn't be as bad as in oth| | | | | | | | | | | | |er images. JPL craters were quantized in| | | | | | | | | | | | |to 7 unique bins with poor resolution at| | | | | | | | | | | | |the smallest sizes, 2 bins from 6-7pixel| | | | | | | | | | | | |s (1.17km-1.365km), 3 bins from 7-8pixel| | | | | | | | | | | | |s (1.365km-1.56km), etc. Some quantizati| | | | | | | | | | | | |on between 6-7 pixel diameters probably | | | | | | | | | | | | |exists. | |g28_4000r| 1 | h |-24.498|316.852| 43.5 | 46.4 | 420 | 375 | 317.898 |High res image of a possibly u|JPL tool piled up 77 craters at 6 pixel | | | | | | | | | | | |nique region (Caldra01). (PROC|diameter. All 341 original JPL craters w| | | | | | | | | | | |ESSED IN 2009 REPORT) |ere classified as 3's. Only 129 of 325 c| | | | | | | | | | | | |lass 3's survived (40%), so a bias towar| | | | | | | | | | | | |d class 3 JPL craters probably does not | | | | | | | | | | | | |exist in this image. 24 of the 129 final| | | | | | | | | | | | |type 3 JPL craters had a minimum size of| | | | | | | | | | | | |6 pixels (48 class 4's). JPL craters wer| | | | | | | | | | | | |e quantized into 22 unique bins with poo| | | | | | | | | | | | |r resolution, 4 bins from 6-7pixels (.26| | | | | | | | | | | | |1km-.3045km), 3 bins from 7-8pixels (.30| | | | | | | | | | | | |45km-.348km), etc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | g8_2865r| 1 | h | 11.830|189.994| 153 | 154 | 795 | 795 | 14891.77 |Medium res image of a region s|Lots of craters, 2010 stats look good. C| | | | | | | | | | | |hared with Buto Facula images |rater duplication problem solved in vers| | | | | | | | | | | |(g8_2139r). Use this one becau|ion 7 of tobill*reg file. JPL tool piled| | | | | | | | | | | |se this region is larger and u|up 80 craters at 5 pixel diameter (of 51| | | | | | | | | | | |naffected by ejecta blanket fr|0), so no problems at 6 pixels (.918km).| | | | | | | | | | | |om Buto Facula. REDO (2010) US|100 unique quantization bins used, so no| | | | | | | | | | | |ING WHOLE IMAGE. |problems there either. | |g28_3800r| 1 | h |-15.475|346.391| 46.4 | 35.0 | 755 | 795 | 974.77 |High res image of a possibly u|Crater density is uneven between right &| | | | | | | | | | | |nique region (Arbela). 2010 - |left parts of image due to heavily groov| | | | | | | | | | | |REDID THE WHOLE IMAGE. |ed terrain. JPL tool was not used for th| | | | | | | | | | | | |is image due to severely grooved terrain| | | | | | | | | | | | |. | |g28_5113r| 1 | h |-15.798|311.741|114.42|114.42| 520 | 520 | 3539.98 |MAP PROJECTED. Smooth02 region|Crater density is uneven between right &| | | | | | | | | | | |. New medium-res context image|left parts of image. Sharp dropoff in cr| | | | | | | | | | | |(2010) for g28_3539r. |aters below 1km diameter, due to underly| | | | | | | | | | | | |ing terrain? Secondary clusters. JPL too| | | | | | | | | | | | |l piled up only 20 craters at 5 pixel di| | | | | | | | | | | | |ameter (of 398), so no problems at 6 pix| | | | | | | | | | | | |els (.686km). 100 unique quantization bi| | | | | | | | | | | | |ns used (49 have craters), so no problem| | | | | | | | | | | | |s there either. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |g28_5613r| 1 | m |-23.924|319.613| 146* | 146* | 1045*| 842* | 18430 |ISIS-projected medium res imag| | | | | | | | | | | | |e of a possibly unique region | | | | | | | | | | | | |(Caldra02). MARK THE BRIGHT RE| | | | | | | | | | | | |GION. ISIS MAP-PROJECTED. | | |g28_5613r| 2 | m |-23.924|319.613| 146* | 146* | 1045*| 842* | 18430 |ISIS-projected medium res imag| | | | | | | | | | | | |e of a possibly unique region | | | | | | | | | | | | |(Caldra02). MARK THE DARK REGI| | | | | | | | | | | | |ON. ISIS MAP-PROJECTED. | | | g7_3613r| 1 | m | 28.319| 8.917 | 147.3| 153.8| 475 | 475 | 5111.476 |Medium res image of unknown re| | | | | | | | | | | | |gion, looks like maybe dark re| | | | | | | | | | | | |gion similar to g8_2865r? Some| | | | | | | | | | | | |problems with a large crater (| | | | | | | | | | | | |Neith) ejecta blanket covering| | | | | | | | | | | | |part of the image. | | |g28_5213r| 1 | m |-14.201| 320.62| 141.1| 122.5| 600 | 795 | 8244.826 |Medium/high image of the "dark| | | | | | | | | | | | |" region. NEED TO ISIS-PROJECT| | | | | | | | | | | | |?? | | |g28_5200r| 1 | m |-14.493|318.174| 146.3| 122.3| 495 | 795 | 7041.142 |Medium/high image of the "brig| | | | | | | | | | | | |ht" region. NEED TO ISIS-PROJE| | | | | | | | | | | | |CT?? | | | g8_2139r| 1 | m | 13.636|201.831| 193.1| 193.5| 575 | 395 | 5829.85 |Medium res image of a region (| | | | | | | | | | | | |Buto Facula) shared with most | | | | | | | | | | | | |of the Anshar Sulcus images (g| | | | | | | | | | | | |8_2865r). Exclude the smooth r| | | | | | | | | | | | |egion in the lower right. This| | | | | | | | | | | | |whole image is inside a large | | | | | | | | | | | | |circular feature. | | | g8_2440r| 1 | m |-28.412| 185.76| 183.9| 223.7| ??? | ??? | ??? |MARK THE BRIGHT REGION AND USE| | | | | | | | | | | | |ISIS TO CALCULATE AREAS. NEED | | | | | | | | | | | | |TO ISIS-PROJECT?? | | | g8_2440r| 2 | m |-28.412| 185.76| 183.9| 223.7| ??? | ??? | ??? |MARK THE DARK REGIONS AND USE | | | | | | | | | | | | |ISIS TO CALCULATE AREAS. NEED | | | | | | | | | | | | |TO ISIS-PROJECT?? | | | g7_3800r| 1 | m | 0.623 |334.784| 198.3| 150.4| 775 | 475 | 10979.08 |Large crater, USE THE WHOLE IM| | | | | | | | | | | | |AGE. NEED TO ISIS-PROJECT? | | |g28_3813r| 1 | m |-15.402|347.073| 47.72| 35.70| 400 | 795 | 541.75 |Light region. NEED TO ISIS-PRO| | | | | | | | | | | | |JECT?? | | | g8_2279r| 1 | m | -9.856|187.781| 184.3| 189.7| 545 | 595 | 6136.65 |Good medium res image, but hea| | | | | | | | | | | | |vily affected by the Melkart D| | | | | | | | | | | | |ome Crater. Region is shared w| | | | | | | | | | | | |ith Buto Facula and Anshar Sul| | | | | | | | | | | | |cus. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |g28_3500r| 1 | l |-15.603|309.815| 16.37| 15.44| 485 | 340 | 41.68 | | | |g28_3500r| 2 | l |-15.603|309.815| 16.37| 15.44| 795 | 375 | 75.35 | | | | g8_2878r| 1 | l | 12.283|192.529|152.35|153.58| 795 | 795 | 14788.07 |Good image, but use the other | | | | | | | | | | | | |Anshar Sulcus image first (g8_| | | | | | | | | | | | |2865r). DO NOT USE THIS ONE. | | | c9_1052r| 1 | l | 16.35 | 53.587|2047.1|2115.0| 345 | 160 | 238994.81|Dark region, low res, context | | | | | | | | | | | | |image - lower priority | | | c9_1052r| 2 | l | 16.35 | 53.587|2047.1|2115.0| 225 | 145 | 141253.73|Dark region, low res, context | | | | | | | | | | | | |image - lower priority | | | c9_1052r| 3 | l | 16.35 | 53.587|2047.1|2115.0| 310 | 330 | 442919.76|Bright region, low res, contex| | | | | | | | | | | | |t image - lower priority | | | g8_2140r| x | l | | | | | | | |Use the other half of the Buto| | | | | | | | | | | | |Facula region first (g8_2139r)| | | | | | | | | | | | |. Craters are hidden under an | | | | | | | | | | | | |ejecta blanket. | | | c9_1065r| x | l | | | | | | | | | | | g8_2266r| x | l | | | | | | | | | | | g8_2427r| x | l | | | | | | | | | | | g8_2466r| x | l | | | | | | | | | | | g7_3200r| x | l | | | | | | | | | | |g28_3513r| x | l | | | | | | | | | | |g28_3626r| x | l | | | | | | | |High res transition between "b| | | | | | | | | | | | |right" and "dark" regions? | | |g28_3639r| x | l | | | | | | | |High res transition between "b| | | | | | | | | | | | |right" and "dark" regions? | | |g28_5600r| x | l | | | | | | | | | | | g8_7800r| x | l | | | | | | | | | | |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|